• BeardedGingerWonder@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    21 hours ago

    I read a thing (not sure if it’s true) that the reason there’s no pockets in women’s clothing is that women have more diverse body shapes than men. Pockets are designed not to interrupt the lines of the garment where possible - it’s more straightforward to place men’s pockets because they’re going to be in a more predictable place when worn Vs women where it ends up making the clothes fit poorly.

    • gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      19 hours ago

      where it ends up making the clothes fit poorly

      a.k.a makes the clothes fit anything but skin-tight because the pockets need space so the clothes have to be wider-cut

      • BeardedGingerWonder@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        13 hours ago

        That seems like an oversimplification, outside looking in for me, but there’s no way a single dimension could ever adequately describe an item of clothing - my sister and wife have similar sized waists, but something tight round the posterior on my wife would be baggy on my sister.

    • SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Random memory unlocked: Back in high school, I had to borrow my girlfriend’s jeans for some reason I don’t remember. (We happened to wear the same size.) I do remember having SO MUCH room in the pockets, because I had narrower hips.