You just reminded me of the arguments I had with people when the start menu changed. They really wanted to press start, go to all programs, look for software publisher folder, look for software name folder, look for software name, click. They swear it was more efficient than pinning it to the start menu, or pressing start and type the first couple of letters to find a program and start it.
8’s did have some major issues though, but eventually 10 nailed it imo. I swear that if modern UI designers come up with something good, it’s wholly by accident and they have no idea why it’s good. What they ended up with on 11 is objectively inferior.
You just reminded me of the arguments I had with people when the start menu changed. They really wanted to press start, go to all programs, look for software publisher folder, look for software name folder, look for software name, click. They swear it was more efficient than pinning it to the start menu, or pressing start and type the first couple of letters to find a program and start it.
8’s did have some major issues though, but eventually 10 nailed it imo. I swear that if modern UI designers come up with something good, it’s wholly by accident and they have no idea why it’s good. What they ended up with on 11 is objectively inferior.
We had users at work who swore by that so hard that my boss bought licenses for “Classic Shell” that just did that.
Usefulness wise, the pinned program and search method is objectively much better.
I think that knowledge of the search method separates the haters from the lovers.
If only the search function worked more than half of the time, just like it doesn’t work on 10