You must log in or register to comment.
If that’s all it takes to refute it, then the argument had no value and the frog/wojak was warranted!
A wojak image can’t really refute anything; it’s just depicting the original poster as being a seething dumbass (an ad hominem response). If the poster accompanies said wojak image with a counterargument, that could refute something, but most wojak responses don’t bother with actually making any kind of salient point. Which is why it’s such a popular format: it’s low effort.
Edit: Realizing the error in my argument, I have included the following addendum:
🎵HOLD ME NOW🎵
😭😂👍
