MarcellusDrum@lemmy.ml to Privacy@lemmy.mlEnglish · 3 个月前This is getting laughably ridiculouslemmy.mlimagemessage-square245fedilinkarrow-up11.43Karrow-down176
arrow-up11.35Karrow-down1imageThis is getting laughably ridiculouslemmy.mlMarcellusDrum@lemmy.ml to Privacy@lemmy.mlEnglish · 3 个月前message-square245fedilink
minus-squareBluewing@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down6·3 个月前Any time you have an election, the winning choice is always ‘first past the post’. No matter how many rounds of voting you place in the way.
minus-squarewurstgulasch3000@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·3 个月前there are other methods, ranked choice for example
minus-squareDiplomjodler@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·3 个月前Americans will literally do anything rather than implement proportional representation.
minus-squareDiplomjodler@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·3 个月前Uh, no, that’s not how this works at all.
minus-squareℍ𝕂-𝟞𝟝@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·3 个月前I get your point, but what those systems do is they don’t let massively unpopular candidates win by dividing the opposition and they let third parties compete without splitting the vote.
Any time you have an election, the winning choice is always ‘first past the post’. No matter how many rounds of voting you place in the way.
there are other methods, ranked choice for example
Americans will literally do anything rather than implement proportional representation.
Uh, no, that’s not how this works at all.
I get your point, but what those systems do is they don’t let massively unpopular candidates win by dividing the opposition and they let third parties compete without splitting the vote.