• 13igTyme@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    18 days ago

    People without insurance die, even from easily preventable things. Then it bogs down the entire health care system because this small thing festers or gets worse. The person is taken to the ED, sometimes by EMS, using up resources. Then they spend hours in the ED being treated and using up hospital resources. Some go home, some have to be admitted taking up a bed and using more hospital resources.

    Then, depending on the issue they could die. I’d want to throw in other options like SNF, ALF, LTC, or Rehab facility, but that requires insurance authorization or money, something people without insurance don’t have.

    So no instead of using tax payer money to give people health care and get preventative treatment, we spend significantly more tax payer money on EMS and hospital resources.

    The same argument, which has been tested and validated, can be said about it being cheaper to give the homeless a free small apartment.

      • witchybitchy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        because “first world” and “third world” terms technically only mean countries allied against or with the USSR during the Cold War, respectively.

        it has no bearing on that country’s development although that’s typically what’s it’s used for nowadays, like your comment