I’m currently trying to decide between CatchyOS and Nobara.

I’m sorry to be generating another of this kind of conversation as I can see they are getting pretty tedious. But you see I’m finally getting ready to take the plunge and try Linux again (after a brief encounter in the early 2000s).

I’m a gamer and I care a lot about gaming but I’m also a game dev. I need to be able to use Unreal Engine, Blender, Gaea, and other dev tools. My understanding is that something like Bazzite isn’t right for me there.

So I’ve been looking at CatchyOS and Nobara. I’ve read their documentation and so far leaning toward CatchyOS. But sometimes people say Nobara is easier to use. I am not afraid of a command line, but frankly I don’t tinker with my computer for fun. I get in and get what I need set up so I can get back to making things.

So what do you all think?

  • just_another_person@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 days ago

    Just to really clarify: there is no real performance difference between “gaming” distros and any other one. They just have some stuff pre-installed you can just install yourself. The only real thing you want to be aware of are standard distros vs immutable distros. I would steer clear of immutable until you’re more comfortable in general.

    All that being said CachyOS (Arch based) is fine, but skip Nobara and just go stock Fedora Gnome or KDE to skip the prepackaged customizations and just get a clean experience.

    • ClockworkN@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      4 days ago

      Okay. I’d been hearing that performance gains were essentially immaterial or on a case by case basis, but that the prepacked stuff helps things “just work”. For example I like Sim Racing and I use a Fanatec race wheel, I’m hoping that one of these would reduce the hassel with it.

      • just_another_person@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        They won’t help anything materially work “better” let’s say. I guess Nobara might have an edge with something like Nvidia drivers being prepackaged in a way that makes them easier to run on first install (it’s a big maybe), but the same issues will arise after the fact with Nvidia’s drivers, just because the hoops you have to jump through are the same everywhere. That’s an Nvidia problem.

        • ᓚᘏᗢ@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          those prepackaged nvidia drivers were a lifesaver for me personally. i kept hitting walls trying to get them on fedora.

      • Vik@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        4 days ago

        The primary concern I see expressed about Nobara is that it’s maintained by a single person. I’m not sure if that’s still true today, however.