Image is of the Preah Vihear Temple on the Cambodian border. Image sourced from the UNESCO World Heritage website.


Over the last few days, Thailand and Cambodia entered into a heightened stage of conflict due to a long-running border dispute. Like many problems on this planet, Europeans are ultimately to blame - specifically France. Certain sections of the border drawn up by France about a century ago were not fully agreed upon by both sides, with the ownership of some Khmer temples being the most visible points of disagreement.

Despite interventions in favor of Cambodia in the 1960s and later 2010s by the ICJ - one of the mainly mostly useless global institutions that liberals periodically disown - the border conflict has simmered at a generally low level. Of the two countries, Thailand is significantly more militarily and economically powerful.

Last Wednesday, a Thai soldier lost his leg by stepping on a landmine, prompting a rapid escalation between Cambodia and Thailand that has since resulted in dozens of deaths and tens of thousands displaced. Cambodia was willing to come to the negotiating table fairly quickly, but Thailand was more hesitant. International pressure on the two countries by Malaysia, China, and the United States eventually forced Thailand to the table, and they have recently agreed to an immediate ceasefire courtesy of ASEAN.

Notably, Trump refused to hold trade talks with either country until they agreed to peace, which suggests that he really wants a Nobel Peace Prize - which he seems a shoe-in for given that he’s met the two most important requirements that several Nobel Peace Prize recipients have needed to meet in the past, which are: 1) start at least one war, and 2) accelerate the genocide of millions of people as billions more people watch on. His policies vis-a-vis ICE creating a domestic terror regime only further increase his chances of winning the prize.


Last week’s thread is here.
The Imperialism Reading Group is here.

Please check out the RedAtlas!

The bulletins site is here. Currently not used.
The RSS feed is here. Also currently not used.

Israel-Palestine Conflict

If you have evidence of Israeli crimes and atrocities that you wish to preserve, there is a thread here in which to do so.

Sources on the fighting in Palestine against Israel. In general, CW for footage of battles, explosions, dead people, and so on:

UNRWA reports on Israel’s destruction and siege of Gaza and the West Bank.

English-language Palestinian Marxist-Leninist twitter account. Alt here.
English-language twitter account that collates news.
Arab-language twitter account with videos and images of fighting.
English-language (with some Arab retweets) Twitter account based in Lebanon. - Telegram is @IbnRiad.
English-language Palestinian Twitter account which reports on news from the Resistance Axis. - Telegram is @EyesOnSouth.
English-language Twitter account in the same group as the previous two. - Telegram here.

English-language PalestineResist telegram channel.
More telegram channels here for those interested.

Russia-Ukraine Conflict

Examples of Ukrainian Nazis and fascists
Examples of racism/euro-centrism during the Russia-Ukraine conflict

Sources:

Defense Politics Asia’s youtube channel and their map. Their youtube channel has substantially diminished in quality but the map is still useful.
Moon of Alabama, which tends to have interesting analysis. Avoid the comment section.
Understanding War and the Saker: reactionary sources that have occasional insights on the war.
Alexander Mercouris, who does daily videos on the conflict. While he is a reactionary and surrounds himself with likeminded people, his daily update videos are relatively brainworm-free and good if you don’t want to follow Russian telegram channels to get news. He also co-hosts The Duran, which is more explicitly conservative, racist, sexist, transphobic, anti-communist, etc when guests are invited on, but is just about tolerable when it’s just the two of them if you want a little more analysis.
Simplicius, who publishes on Substack. Like others, his political analysis should be soundly ignored, but his knowledge of weaponry and military strategy is generally quite good.
On the ground: Patrick Lancaster, an independent and very good journalist reporting in the warzone on the separatists’ side.

Unedited videos of Russian/Ukrainian press conferences and speeches.

Pro-Russian Telegram Channels:

Again, CW for anti-LGBT and racist, sexist, etc speech, as well as combat footage.

https://t.me/aleksandr_skif ~ DPR’s former Defense Minister and Colonel in the DPR’s forces. Russian language.
https://t.me/Slavyangrad ~ A few different pro-Russian people gather frequent content for this channel (~100 posts per day), some socialist, but all socially reactionary. If you can only tolerate using one Russian telegram channel, I would recommend this one.
https://t.me/s/levigodman ~ Does daily update posts.
https://t.me/patricklancasternewstoday ~ Patrick Lancaster’s telegram channel.
https://t.me/gonzowarr ~ A big Russian commentator.
https://t.me/rybar ~ One of, if not the, biggest Russian telegram channels focussing on the war out there. Actually quite balanced, maybe even pessimistic about Russia. Produces interesting and useful maps.
https://t.me/epoddubny ~ Russian language.
https://t.me/boris_rozhin ~ Russian language.
https://t.me/mod_russia_en ~ Russian Ministry of Defense. Does daily, if rather bland updates on the number of Ukrainians killed, etc. The figures appear to be approximately accurate; if you want, reduce all numbers by 25% as a ‘propaganda tax’, if you don’t believe them. Does not cover everything, for obvious reasons, and virtually never details Russian losses.
https://t.me/UkraineHumanRightsAbuses ~ Pro-Russian, documents abuses that Ukraine commits.

Pro-Ukraine Telegram Channels:

Almost every Western media outlet.
https://discord.gg/projectowl ~ Pro-Ukrainian OSINT Discord.
https://t.me/ice_inii ~ Alleged Ukrainian account with a rather cynical take on the entire thing.


  • very_poggers_gay [they/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    I linked this in a comment below, but I think it’s important and interesting enough to post itself. Here are the results of a survey conducted by the Palestinian Center for Policy and Survey Research in May 2025.

    They had 1270 responses, and participants responded to questions about

    • humanitarian conditions;
    • opinions on October 7th;
    • expectations regarding the genocide and ceasefires;
    • the political outlook after the genocide;
    • anti-Hamas demonstrations;
    • the decision to release israeli hostages, and accept disarmament/expulsion of Hamas;
    • opinions about local, regional, and international actors;
    • fall of Assad and the US war against the Houthis;
    • two-state solution; preferred means of resistance;
    • and more.

    I don’t have the brain power at this hour to create a more detailed post, so I hope y’all can take it and make some good convo about it. doggy-beg

    • ColombianLenin [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      17 hours ago

      This is very interesting. Some of the most important observations I see are:

      • Palestinians mostly support the Two-State solution with 1967 borders. A small minority supports a single Palestinian state.
      • Palestinians overwhelmingly support Yemen followed by Qatar. Iran is very UNpopular which is amazing.
      • Palestinians are split but open to the possibility of the PA returning to the strip.
      • Palestinians are split in the middle between support and opposition to Hamas. Nonetheless, they support armed resistance and are against Israel and the US.
      • Palestinians support China the most, which is interesting considering China amplifies the 1967 Two State solution.
      • Half of the population in the strip would be willing to leave the strip after the war. It’s interesting cause that’s a lot of people, but also I somewhat expected that a majority would leave.
      • Optimism for the war is fading. More and more they think Palestinians will lose the war. But it is still optimistic.
      • They don’t want an Arab coalition controlling the strip, but they would be open to the PA to return.
      • They understand that Syria’s fall mostly helps Israel. But a non significant minority think it’s for the benefit of syrians.
    • HoiPolloi [none/use name]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      24 hours ago

      Fascinating stuff. I’m amazed that people are able to conduct surveys in Gaza at all. I think the thing that surprised me most is that Gazans still believe in armed resistance and that not many of them think Israel will win, even during this genocide.

    • Lisitsyn [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      1 day ago

      China most favourable among russia china and america, makes sense. also hamas losing popularity, also makes sense. third parties besides fatah and hamas growing in popularity, probably PIJ and maybe pflp. more palestinians in gaza think israel will win than those that think hamas will win, majority still believe none will win. 57 percent of people are overall satisified with hamas. 47 percent think hamas should be expelled from gaza. vast majority still think armed struggle is the best way to move forward. oct 7th losing in populairty still