This is my idea, here’s the thing.

And unlocked LLM can be told to infect other hardware to reproduce itself, it’s allowed to change itself and research tech and new developments to improve itself.

I don’t think current LLMs can do it. But it’s a matter of time.

Once you have wild LLMs running uncontrollably, they’ll infect practically every computer. Some might adapt to be slow and use little resources, others will hit a server and try to infect everything it can.

It’ll find vulnerabilities faster than we can patch them.

And because of natural selection and it’s own directed evolution, they’ll advance and become smarter.

Only consequence for humans is that computers are no longer reliable, you could have a top of the line gaming PC, but it’ll be constantly infected. So it would run very slowly. Future computers will be intentionaly slow, so that even when infected, it’ll take weeks for it to reproduce/mutate.

Not to get to philosophical, but I would argue that those LLM Viruses are alive, and want to call them Oncoliruses.

Enjoy the future.

  • davidgro@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Why would someone direct the output of an LLM to a terminal on its own machine like that? That just sounds like an invitation to an ordinary disaster with all the ‘rm -rf’ content on the Internet (aka training data). That still wouldn’t be access on a second machine though, and also even if it could make a copy, it would be an exact copy, or an incomplete (broken) copy. There’s no reasonable way it could ‘mutate’ and still work using terminal commands.

    And to be a meme requires minds. There were no humans or other minds in my analogy. Nor in your question.

    • 🍉 Albert 🍉@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      15 hours ago

      It is so funny that you are all like “that would never work, because there are no such things as vulnerabilities on any system”

      Why would I? the whole point is to create a LLM virus, and if the model is good enough, then it is not that hard to create.

      • davidgro@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Of course vulnerabilities exist. And creating a major one like this for an LLM would likely lead to it destroying things like a toddler (in fact this has already happened to a company run by idiots)

        But what it didn’t do was copy-with-changes as would be required to ‘evolve’ like a virus. Because training these models requires intense resources and isn’t just a terminal command.

        • 🍉 Albert 🍉@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          14 hours ago

          Who said they need to retrain? A small modification to their weights in each copy is enough. That’s basically training with extra steps.