• ricecake@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    14 hours ago

    If there were a practical way to do it, a way to ensure that only those who were well informed on a topic could have a say in it wouldn’t be an issue. The only barrier to voting would be your desire to inform yourself.

    Unfortunately there isn’t, because just about every word in the above sentences can be twisted by someone with illintent.
    The concept isn’t fundamentally flawed, it’s just blocked by insurmountable obstacles.

    • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Thank you for getting what I was trying to say. Spot on, I don’t think the idea is wrong. It would be nice if there was a test to say “hey are you able to vote on these topics, have you researched, are you voting with your brain or with emotions?” - which is why I say the idea is fine. There isn’t though. There isn’t a single way to do that fairly or equitably.

      Thank god the commenters immediately jumped down my throat to tell me what I already knew.

      • muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Exactly. The problem with having to meet certain criteria for being able to vote is who gets to set that criteria. We would end up with “black people have to guess the number of bubbles in this bar of soap” all over again.