• theneverfox@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    And airplanes shouldn’t be in each other’s airspace

    I don’t know what you’re trying to say, the airplanes nearly running into each other is the clear problem

    • Check out John Oliver’s take on air traffic control on LWT

      I was a kid when Reagan fired all the striking air traffic controllers. It turns out it takes a long time to train them, so we haven’t recovered from that one incident. It also means all ATCs are overworked, still underpaid and using outdated hardware and methods.

      Air travel was screwed even before Trump defunded the FAA.

      • theneverfox@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        20 hours ago

        Fair, but it has gotten very noticably worse based on Trump’s deregulation catching up on the aircrafts and the latest round of forcing out air traffic control

        Also, I didn’t know you could just say “all pronouns”. I like that a lot, I’m really uncomfortable putting myself in boxes and that describes my preferences very succinctly

        • Uriel238 [all pronouns]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          18 hours ago

          Yes, whereas prior congresses and presidencies squeezed regulatory agencies and let them get captured, Trump is just taking a wrecking ball to them. What we’re going through now really can’t be compared to what happened before, including during Reagan’s term and George W. Bush.

          Re: Pronouns, TBH I was in theater as a kid and TTRPGs as a teen and young adult, so it was super easy to get comfortable whatever pronouns suited my character. And yeah, embraced my enby status as I got past my forties.

    • GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      23 hours ago

      There are things you can control and things you can’t. I can’t keep the planes out of each other’s airspace, but I can keep my seat belt on.

      That would be more insightful if I wasn’t a pilot…

      Tap for spoiler

      I’m not.

      • theneverfox@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        20 hours ago

        Yeah, that’ll keep you from getting slammed on the ceiling…in a situation that should never, ever happen. Which I’d over a midair collision, in which case you’re just screwed no matter what you do

        I don’t blame the pilot either, they did their job properly. It was the military that failed to coordinate with the civilian air control tower, which also could have been avoided if the civilian tower had radar

        What should you do? Demand better. Not think “I would have been fine, they must’ve been stupid”

        You can’t protect against every freak event, what you can do is be one drop in the wave that demands competence from our government

        • GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          20 hours ago

          There are certainly things that can be done better. My instance should give an idea about how much my government can do about this problem. That said, just like in a car, there is no good reason you shouldn’t be wearing your seat belt most of the time. And there are plenty of situations they can’t fix, such as clear-air turbulence. But the seat belt still helps.

          • theneverfox@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            20 hours ago

            It applies to everyone - you’ve had an event this year too. I should have said our governments

            Air traffic control is just not an individual thing. Not even an individual country thing.

            And I’m aware of unexpected turbulence…I just don’t see getting banged about that big a deal. Shit happens. Wrong place, wrong time… Sure, put on your seatbelt when you’re sitting down, but even if you don’t you’re probably not going to die from it

            But planes nearly colliding? Actually colliding? That should never happen… It’s a 3D arena, the sky is huge. Planes should neither fall apart nor be anywhere near each other without coordination

            We made air travel very safe with old technology, for a long time too. This is a very recent problem, and totally unacceptable

            • GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              19 hours ago

              And I’m aware of unexpected turbulence…I just don’t see getting banged about that big a deal. Shit happens. Wrong place, wrong time… Sure, put on your seatbelt when you’re sitting down, but even if you don’t you’re probably not going to die from it

              “J. E. Littlewood, a mathematician at Cambridge University, wrote about the law of truly large numbers in his 1986 book, “Littlewood’s Miscellany.” He said the average person is alert for about eight hours every day, and something happens to the average person about once a second. At this rate, you will experience 1 million events every thirty-five days. This means when you say the chances of something happening are one in a million, it also means about once a month. The monthly miracle is called Littlewood’s Law.” - David McRaney

              This is why people build houses in flood zones. What are the odds this will affect me? And every year, people gamble with those one in a million odds, and someone loses. Then their friends console each other at the funeral that it was a freak accident and who could have predicted it would happen? And why were they in that position? Because people don’t have an intuitive grasp of statistics, particularly low probability and high frequency, and what the are odds it will happen to them. But it’s happening to someone all the time, and much more likely to the one who says, “Well, it probably won’t be me.”

              • theneverfox@pawb.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                17 hours ago

                I don’t think you get what I’m saying.

                If you build your house in a flood zone… Well, I feel for you. That sucks, but I’m not going to lose sleep over it

                If the state is cutting taxes to incentize building in a flood plain (which is a thing that has happened), in going to be very upset

                • GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  9 hours ago

                  Okay, I see what you’re saying there. I don’t agree with the stance for the first part, but that’s a personal choice. After all, the government could not only not incentivize building in a flood zone, they could make it illegal.