• lath@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      Because many “players” are refunding after a fap, which is logged and reviewed. Also, suspicious or new transactions are often flagged and reviewed. So a lot of such side content is being pushed in front of the banks and payment processors by horny clients who unwittingly expose their kinks.

      • snooggums@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        2 days ago

        If a large number of refunds came from a single source it seems like Steam would be the one addressing the issue, not payment processors.

      • logicbomb@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Seem like an easy solution would be to have certain transactions be nonrefundable.

        I say easy, but I guess it would involve quite a bit of software changes, and then you’d also have to deal with angry customers who ignored numerous warnings that a purchase would be final.

        • pulsewidth@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          34 minutes ago

          That’s even less consumer friendly. If you purchase a game and it turns out to be shovelware that barely works and has a bunch of gamed reviews on the store page? Oh too bad sap, you got conned this is non-refundable.

          Consumers had to fight for games that do refundable, I don’t think we should be quick to consider loopholes.

    • SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      Those payment processors can just look at the store and see that it sells smut. Those payment processors do their own due diligence.