• Supervisor194@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 hours ago

      So I know there has to be a reason why these switches are vitally important but doesn’t it seem weird that you can take a catastrophic action like turning the fuel supply off when you’re in mid-takeoff? If you try and put a modern car in reverse at 65 MPH, the car is like “haha no” and ignores you.

      • neuracnu@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 hours ago

        From the article…

        The fuel switches were “designed to be intentionally moved,” according to CNN safety analyst David Soucie, who said cases in which all fuel switches were turned off accidentally are “extremely rare.”

        “Throughout the years, those switches have been improved to make sure that they cannot be accidentally moved and that they’re not automatic. They don’t move themselves in any manner,” Soucie said on Friday.

        And the photo of the throttle (middle) and fuel cutoff switches (bottom):

        https://media.cnn.com/api/v1/images/stellar/prod/c-gettyimages-951922648-20250711223914009.jpg?q=w_1160%2Cc_fill%2Ff_webp

        There’s just one-level-deeper of questions I’d have here. How were the switches designed such that they prevented accidental activation? Because it looks like they just get simply flipped down. Could it be pull-out-and-down? Or maybe there’s a lot of resistance during the switch action?

        • Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 hours ago

          They have metal detents; you have to pull the lever out, then push it down against a reasonably heavy spring.

          These had to be very deliberately moved to the cutoff position.

        • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 hours ago

          How were the switches designed such that they prevented accidental activation? Because it looks like they just get simply flipped down. Could it be pull-out-and-down? Or maybe there’s a lot of resistance during the switch action?

          The lever-lock fuel switches are designed to prevent accidental activation - they must be pulled up to unlock before flipping, a safety feature dating back to the 1950s. This isn’t a new or weird design. It’s essentially the standard used in basically every plane because it works.

          “It would be almost impossible to pull both switches with a single movement of one hand, and this makes accidental deployment unlikely,” a Canada-based air accidents investigator, who wanted to remain unnamed, told the BBC.

        • Supervisor194@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Yeah and of course, you can also just ram the thing into the ground. I hate to think this was a deliberate act, but it’s sure sounding like it.

      • Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Apparently they need to be pulled to change their orientation, I’m wondering if the mechanism simply wore out?

            • dastanktal@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              7 hours ago

              If that does not take away from the fact that these Pilots were very well skilled.

              If the company is at fault it’s due to over scheduling since preliminary report indicates no mechanical failures.

              • deranger@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                7
                ·
                5 hours ago

                Skilled yes, but apparently concealing a mental health issue. This is a huge cultural issue in aviation. Nobody wants to lose their job, so you just bury it.

                • dastanktal@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  9
                  ·
                  4 hours ago

                  There’s absolutely no proof that these Pilots were suicidal. I think speculation of such is disrespectful until further evidence shows such things such as in the case of MH 370 which is highly speculated with a lot of evidence to be a pilot suicide.

                  • hddsx@lemmy.ca
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    ·
                    4 hours ago

                    I’m not the person you replied to and I’m not familiar with India’s certificate process, but the FAA is a stickler about mental health - even for a PPL on a class 3. It doesn’t matter if you’re getting treatment or not. The fact that you have any history of mental illness is huge. It seems really fucking stupid to me, especially if you are getting help.

                    I hope to god indias certificate procedures aren’t as ridiculous as the FAA

        • bulwark@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          12
          ·
          edit-2
          7 hours ago

          There are redundant systems on modern planes that can handle multiple failures. If they’re saying it’s fuel related my guess is dirty jet fuel. It would explain a stuck fuel valve. There’s lots of ground crew checks before flight, and one is checking the fuel tanks for contamination. Just a speculation.

          • Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            5 hours ago

            These switches are evidently monitored by the aircraft’s systems, as the investigators seem to know for a fact when these switches were moved. This is not a “failure”, unless the switch moved by itself.

            I’m not sure why you’re trying to “I reckon” this, when we know why the engines stopped.