• Einar@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    67
    ·
    edit-2
    12 hours ago

    People weren’t supposed to create that shortcut in the first place, thus disrespecting the park.

    • Kichae@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Green spaces: Just for viewing.

      What kind of dystopian hellscape do you want the world to be, exactly?

    • huppakee@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      10 hours ago

      weren’t supposed to

      As if walking on grass in an emtpy park is comparable to driving a red light on a busy street.

    • Neshura@bookwyr.me
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      47
      ·
      11 hours ago

      The park design should have accounted for the crosswalk on the top intersection from the get go or, alternatively, once the people made their desire for a path there obvious. The park isn’t some sentient thing with its own opinion, it got made by people with 2 main functions: enhancing the environment and serving as a foot path. It is obviously failing at the second until the designers finally relented and put a proper path down to the crosswalk.

      Note: you will always get people not using the path but when it’s enough people to form a permanent trail then the park design obviously did not account for a rather popular destination and should be revised.