• xia@lemmy.sdf.orgOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    14 hours ago

    I wonder if people are mistaking my rough gimp composition for AI giving the guy a third arm…

    • halvar@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      the problem isn’t the third arm, or the multitude of fingers on the third picture for that matter, it’s the very fact that this is AI

      • xia@lemmy.sdf.orgOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Yes, the base images are AI generated, but it will actually refuse to generate such an image (child endangerment or abduction).

      • xia@lemmy.sdf.orgOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        10 hours ago

        I have no idea what that actually proves, as I could just as easily mess with the gimp screenshot in, say… gimp… (or I suppose ask GPT to make a gimp screenshot?) but here you go.

        • ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 hours ago

          I just wanted to see if you’d actually go out of your way to fake a gimp screenshot. The guy has 17 fingers and 3 arms and the baby has 14 toes and one hand is meshing into the arm of the man. It’s AI. The screenshot also doesn’t have a layer for most things that would have layers like the text that says “Yoink” and for some reason the baby is half in one layer and half another. The checkered pattern in the layer view is messed up. Why would you go to such lengths to lie? Just say it’s AI. It’s obvious.