• FQQD@lemmy.ohaa.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    2 days ago

    Jokes aside, I think this would actually be an interesting thing that would get younger people back in cinemas. At least for the absurdity of it.

    • RandomTester@lemmybefree.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      for me to come back they would have to:

      • get cheaper
      • be less loud, like I feel like I could have hearing loss after going to the cinema
      • better screen quality
      • less annoying people
      • no ads, seriously. I’m paying to see the thing and still have to endure ads? And people complain about streaming services when cinemas have been doing this for ages
        • LesserAbe@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          Nice, thanks for sharing. I might have missed it but does it say how they handled audio?

          Superimposing images would probably have more happy accidents than superimposing reversed audio, which would probably just make things unintelligible.

          • Cracks_InTheWalls@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            Don’t quote me on this (haven’t seen it and only pulled partial clips before answering), but I think the audio just runs as per normal. Though it’d be kind of cool to have reverse audio as an option (if in a theatre, idk, have a set up kinda like what folks do for silent discos/some bluetooth device with serious multi-connection capacity or something, and people who opt for it have one earpiece in while the vanilla track plays in the room).

            Only aware of it 'cause the rep theatre here did a screening once. Seemed cool.