Don’t. Stop talking with these people. Cut them out of your lives. They are child murderers.
Listen, do not judge
The first thing to do if someone expresses uncertainty about vaccines to you, say researchers, is not to judge or dismiss them.
What your suggesting only further alienates them, and lets them live in their echo chamber.
There is no convincing morons.
Every human has the capacity to learn and change. You just have to understand their perspective and find the fallacy in their internal logic. It requires monumental amounts of patience and creative thinking to find where their misunderstanding is, present them with an argument that they can conceptualize which forces them to confront the contradictions of their position, help ease them through the difficult process of overcoming the cognitive dissonance, and then begin the long process of educating them.
They have been given opportunity to change already and continue to murder children.
Sorry you are so simple minded and cannot see how you are blinded by your own prejudices. You’re no better than them in how you approach the world. You’re just the other side of that same coin.
Child murderer.
Up hill conversation to get people who are against vaccines to trust a predatory for profit medical industry that has given us all reason to distrust. I’m someone that relies on herd immunity, so please get you and your kids vaccinated, but I understand where people are coming from even though they’ve come to trust baseless theories that are based on intentional ignorance.
The problem comes from the fact most people cannot differentiate between the science side of and the industry side of pharmaceuticals. Same thing with college. The people who think “college is a scam” do not differentiate between the academics and the administrative aspects.
It all boils down to people not understanding the problem isn’t the thing itself; it is the system that dictates the distribution of it and allows people of ill intent to exploit their control over its distribution for profit.
Their logic is backwards. They see “Bad People™ tell me that I need Thing© so they can exploit me for money, so Thing© must have been created by Bad People™ to exploit me, thus the thing must be a Bad Thing©” instead of seeing it as “this beneficial thing is being controlled by bad people who are exploiting people’s desire for its benefits for proft.”