Because Paramount did us all the disservice of not preservingdishing out the dough on DS9 or Voyager on film which could be in order to upscale quality. I used screenshots on Trekcore.com, upscaled, and cropped elements on my phone.
Edit: a matter of money and not available sources correction per Australis13@fedia.io
My understanding was that DS9 (and I thought most, if not all, of Voyager) was made on film like TNG, then edited on videotape with effects added. Creating a HD version for them would be the same process as remastering TNG. As far as I know, the reason this hasn’t happened is the cost involved.
You’re right, I misremembered, it does boil down to their stinginess. Their return on value after remastering TNG wasn’t enough to garner the effort on the others. Maybe since the merger, it’ll be reconsidered. Won’t hold my breath, though.
Because Paramount did us all the disservice of not
preservingdishing out the dough on DS9 or Voyageron film which could bein order to upscale quality. I used screenshots on Trekcore.com, upscaled, and cropped elements on my phone.Edit: a matter of money and not available sources correction per Australis13@fedia.io
My understanding was that DS9 (and I thought most, if not all, of Voyager) was made on film like TNG, then edited on videotape with effects added. Creating a HD version for them would be the same process as remastering TNG. As far as I know, the reason this hasn’t happened is the cost involved.
Edited to add: https://treknews.net/2017/02/02/why-ds9-voyager-not-on-blu-ray-hd/
You’re right, I misremembered, it does boil down to their stinginess. Their return on value after remastering TNG wasn’t enough to garner the effort on the others. Maybe since the merger, it’ll be reconsidered. Won’t hold my breath, though.