• pie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    20 hours ago

    It’s the same problem, though. “Oh no, we need to store 4 digits instead of 2” vs “Oh no, we need to store int64 instead of int32”. Or y’know, just use RFC3999 if you can’t do 64-bit. It’s a tedious lift, but it’s not a crisis. People that need to change will do.

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      14 hours ago

      You might read up on the everlasting prevalence of ancient COBOL still running too much of our banking and government. the same software that caused y2k is still there

    • IphtashuFitz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      18 hours ago

      The problem is all the existing IoT devices etc that haven’t pre-planned for this. It’s a safe bet a lot of consumer devices with embedded systems haven’t planned for this and likely don’t have user friendly upgrade paths.

      • pie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        18 hours ago

        I used to work at a major iot company. While, yeah, some devices will probably be left behind, most would’ve had this covered from the outset. The ones left behind were never intended to make it that long anyhow.