MyDarkestTimeline01@ani.social to memes@lemmy.world · 2 days agoI could do with less of these "once in a lifetime events", please.ani.socialimagemessage-square212fedilinkarrow-up11.13Karrow-down129
arrow-up11.1Karrow-down1imageI could do with less of these "once in a lifetime events", please.ani.socialMyDarkestTimeline01@ani.social to memes@lemmy.world · 2 days agomessage-square212fedilink
minus-squarePossibly linux@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 day agoAn Indian Pakistan conflict would kill lots of people and create millions of refugees. (And that’s ignoring the nuclear risk) If the US can stabilize the situation let them
minus-squaredovahking@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up8·1 day agoUS can’t stabilize itself. And we all know how “good” US is at resolving conflicts.
minus-squarePossibly linux@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 day agoYou are probably right. However, it is always to good to hope for the best and prepare for the worst.
minus-squareStonerCowboy@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·18 hours agoNah let them pop off. Push the red button.
minus-squareA_Random_Idiot@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 day agoTrump is more like to stir up trouble on the thought he could come in and annex the land after everyones dead/weakened.
An Indian Pakistan conflict would kill lots of people and create millions of refugees. (And that’s ignoring the nuclear risk)
If the US can stabilize the situation let them
US can’t stabilize itself. And we all know how “good” US is at resolving conflicts.
You are probably right. However, it is always to good to hope for the best and prepare for the worst.
Nah let them pop off. Push the red button.
Trump is more like to stir up trouble on the thought he could come in and annex the land after everyones dead/weakened.