What is the positive outcome of defending an authoritarian regime like Putin’s? I don’t see how that advances socialist goals in any way. I am learning that Zelenskyy and Ukraine are not as good as Western media describes, but I do not see how Putin is better. I’m interested in being part of Lemmygrad.ml, but not if it defends authoritarian regimes especially if they are not working towards socialism/communism. I want to work towards socialist goals, but I do not want to be used as a tool in some authoritarian geopolitical mess. Russia also gives me the impression of being colonialist but I’m not sure if that’s accurate

  • Large Bullfrog@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    It really just comes down to two very simple things:

    1. While Putin/Russia certainly aren’t socialist, they at least don’t actively try to scrub away and bury every last remnant of their socialist past, which is more than can be said for certain other eastern European countries. Likewise, they have shown real willingness to cooperate and provide valuable support to other actual socialist nations like Cuba and the DPRK.

    2. Russia isn’t the dominant Imperialist power, the US and it’s European buddies are. Expecting a socialist revolution to happen anytime in the near future in the imperial core as things currently stand is naive at best, the rest of the world must lift themselves up on their own first. If Russia falls, it’s easy mode for the West to continue dominating the rest of the world, China for all it’s merits can’t take on the entirety of the West by itself.

    • yet_another_commie@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      5 days ago

      Russia isn’t even imperialist. It suffers from the same imperialist attacks as everybody else. Except Russia can stand for herself