security clearance would legally prevent him from sharing privileged information If he became privy to it. It’s not a good tactic of opposition to be silenced by the people you’re opposing.
So it’s better for him to not have the information, compared to having information but not being allowed to disclose it?
Or do you mean that he is having access to privileged information and he is disclosing it even though he doesn’t have permission to it?
It means that everything PP is currently sharing is made up misinformation because he has cut himself off from having real information. He is firmly in favour of that because he can say anything, real or imagined, that he thinks will appeal to his potential voters. Truth is something they might not agree with so it’s better for him not to be held to that. Inuendo is so much easier to spin than fact.
So it’s better for him to not have the information, compared to having information but not being allowed to disclose it?
Or do you mean that he is having access to privileged information and he is disclosing it even though he doesn’t have permission to it?
It means that everything PP is currently sharing is made up misinformation because he has cut himself off from having real information. He is firmly in favour of that because he can say anything, real or imagined, that he thinks will appeal to his potential voters. Truth is something they might not agree with so it’s better for him not to be held to that. Inuendo is so much easier to spin than fact.