• KevonLooney@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    “Raytheon never deactivated their missiles, they just don’t work over the target.”

    That’s deactivating them dummy. Where do you think Ukraine is going with their Starlinks? Disneyland?

    • Zengen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      Missiles and satellite arrays have no similarities in the way they technologically function. So this argument doesn’t actually hold any water. Elon musk is the operator of the starlink. Ukraine does not operate starlink satellites. Ukraine operates the missiles we GIVE to them. Meaning the baton of ownership has been passed off from the united states to Ukraine. The Ukrainian operators then have the autonomy to do with that as they see fit. This is why we give Ukraine guns and bullets but we dont give them the human soldier to fire them. Because this implicates direct US involvement in an offensive strike against Russia. In June 2023 starlink won contract with the pentagon. Meaning elon musk and starlink are acting as agents of the united states government and as such as bound by very similar rules of engagement that the normal US military is. The difference between giving them missiles and starlink is that we can’t just say “here are your very own satellites that you have the keys and drivers wheel to and they belong to you now”

    • Bezerker03@lemmy.bezzie.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      19
      ·
      1 year ago

      Over Ukrainian territory. For defensive purposes. Where it was originally agreed for. Crimea hasn’t been Ukraine for years (even though it should be). Offensives into Russia were not part of any operational original deals.

      It’s not deactivating if it was never live there.

      • KevonLooney@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The individual base station (or whatever) has its service deactivated when it goes to Crimea, which is internationally recognized as Ukrainian territory.

        No one but Russian bootlickers think Crimea is part of Russia.

        • Bezerker03@lemmy.bezzie.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          Right. The individual base stations always have had a service region. It’s why I can’t use starlink over international waters and the same thing happens from a fishing boat or anything. There’s no purposeful deactivations. Just boundaries of service already established.

          It’s literally part of the service when you sign up.

          You’re right that technically he could provide coverage anywhere in the world. There’s lots of reasons he doesn’t. But that’s always been part of the service.

          18 UNcountries recognize it as Russian territory. Some of them large superpowers or economic hubs. Including one that’s expected to launch starlink soon. (Though all generally shitty countries.)

          But aside from that. The rules for supplying things to Ukraine were spelled out very clearly. It’s why none of the Western supplies hsve been used in Russian territory attacks. Doing so Russia claimed it would retaliate.

          The articles are claiming that he intentionally turned it off when it was originally on and that’s not the case. It was never active there.

          • tym@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Look if you want to play semantics, fine. The most finite definition is that starlink satellites deactivate every time they pass over Crimea. He actively contributes to russias strike capabilities on a daily basis. It’s far worse than the story, not better.

            Won’t matter when Ukraine creates their own capabilities, but fuck musk just the same.

            • Bezerker03@lemmy.bezzie.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              Musk is beholden to various international laws when providing this coverage. Like it or not Russia considers crimea their territory and would not respond kindly to musk allowing it’s use over their territory.

              Like I love how everyone just expects this dude to just as a civilian piss off a nation who can shoot his satellites down or consider it an act of war on his own.

          • uis@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            18 UNcountries recognize it as Russian territory

            Russia, Belarus, China, North Korea, Cuba, Eritrea. What are rest of 12 countries?

            • Bezerker03@lemmy.bezzie.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              India , and several African and middle eastern countries. (iirc Iran was on there etc). By no means a real winner list but just worth noting.

              In particular India which starlink is set to go active in very soon.

        • Bezerker03@lemmy.bezzie.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yes. However Russia has claimed it years before this conflict and threatened retaliation if westerners interfere. It’s why all of the supplies we give are only used in Ukraine. The attacks on Russian soil are not with Western supplies intentionally and this would be no different.

          • uis@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            However Russia has claimed it years before this conflict

            No, it claimed when conflict started. Just before February Putin didn’t go any further.

              • uis@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                This is correct. Statement that Crimea was annexed before conflict started is incorrect.

                • Bezerker03@lemmy.bezzie.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Maybe I’m misunderstanding please correct me. Crimea was annexed by Russia in 2014 no? The current crisis started much later than that no? (Even though technically many consider them connected for obvious reasons.)

                  • uis@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    The current crisis started much later than that no?

                    No, crisis wasn’t ended, it was paused.