Gene Hackman, who suffered from Alzheimer’s, lived in the house with his dead wife for a week before he died.

Of the three dogs living in the house, one died because it was locked in a carrier and therefore probably starved to death. The two free-living dogs were the only ones to survive.

  • BackgrndNoize@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    This is why I detest the idea of keeping someone alive at any cost that’s currently the law, euthanasia should be legalized and available to everyone, at some point we all have to die, I don’t understand why make people suffer into old age, we put pets down when they get too old and sick because we know that’s mercy, then why is the same mercy not shown to human beings.

    Edit: I am talking about auto euthanasia, aka an individuals right to chose his own end, not others making that choice for old / sick people

    • ohwhatfollyisman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 day ago

      because people can’t misuse laws for pet euthanasia in order to get an early inheritance, or to get their toe in before a will changes.

      in many scenarios, euthanasia does make sense but there is ample opportunity for greedy people to misuse such laws. it would be hazardous to enact such a law unless adequate protection is provided.

      • Tja@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Well, so provide adequate protection… Like with universal healthcare, many countries have figured it out, it’s not really trailblazing territory anymore.

      • BackgrndNoize@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 day ago

        I was referring to auto euthanasia, where the person choses it of his own will, of course lots and lots of saftey and security checks need to still be added to make sure no one is being coerced into it

    • exocortex@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Sorry, are you saying other people should be allowed to “put down” someone whenever they decide it’s mercy? Are you applying your example about putting down pets directly to humans?

      You know who had a big euthanasia program? The Nazis. They murdered people who were unworthy to live. They killed (among many groups of people) people born with disabilities and justified it as “mercy”.

      I think you meam something else so please be careful what you are writing. It’s easily misunderstood.

      • jaek@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Euthanasia can be voluntary.

        You have no idea what you’re talking about, and frankly, people like you are the reason that so many people are forced to suffer through an undignified, painful and traumatic death, despite the existence of better alternatives.

        Please be careful what you’re writing.

      • riquisimo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Fwiw, I understood their comment as “everyone should have the right to decide when they want to die, we need death with dignity laws”

        I felt the implication was people with terminal illnesses and such.

        I did not interpret it anywhere near “we should murder healthy people against their will in gas chambers.”

      • BackgrndNoize@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 day ago

        I’m talking about individuals choosing euthanasia of their own free will, not others choosing that option for someone.