I use ad blockers and open source privacy focused software whenever I can but occasionally I have to use computers that don’t belong to me or an older phone where my usual applications aren’t installed and seeing all the advertisements just feels dirty and dystopian.

I think the worst ads are the text to speech ones that say “Download this app today”. The unblinking energenic people saying you can make a living at home are probably a close second.

  • MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s a fun game of too many ads leading to adblockers, which leads to those not using adblockers to get twice as many ads, more people use adblockers, etc. Until the only way for a company to make money on a website is either to sell your data, or charge for the service.

    Yay.

    • ttmrichter@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’d happily pay for a service if I could have a guarantee, with legal teeth (like a service level agreement with truly massive penalties for breach), that the service won’t ever do any of the following:

      1. Put an ad in front of my face.
      2. Sell my personal information.

      I used to pay for some services to get the “ad-free” version, but almost invariably this chain got subsequently followed: ad-free → opt-in “curated” ads → opt-out “curated” ads → “curated” ads → dropping all pretense of there being any advantage to paying as the site becomes ad-o-rama.

      So I won’t pay for sites. I just block their ads.

    • MoodyRaincloud@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      The pattern is always the same. No ads - ads - no ads if you pay - no ads if you pay but we sell your data - personalised ads because you pay, and we sell your data.