• InevitableSwing [none/use name]@hexbear.netOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    10 days ago

    The more I think about it - the more it’s staggering that nobody at WaPo thought to examine the PDF for any clue possible. Looking for metadata is the most basic possible. Why didn’t a single person at WaPo think of that? It’s easy to overlook stuff. I do so more than the average person. But who has opposable thumbs and can operate a phone and use email? Me! If I was a reporter and I had a PDF (or any technical issue) - I’d ask somebody I know (or use a throwaway account at Reddit) to remind me of all the basic things I was overlooking.

    Sad.

    • TerkErJerbs@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      9 days ago

      Mainstream journos suck. They’re getting corpobashed and competing with chatbots now so that’s part of why they don’t have their wits about them I guess. The good ones have all gone indie or reader-supported over the past half decade. I only started “doing” social media of any kind right around lockdowns and found the mElon site before he bought it and ended up following a ton of bleeding edge writers blasting stories realtime. Most of them have migrated to bluesky which is good. I wish more of them had given Mastodon a chance tho.