No, because as i understand it, you can change the meaning of words without directly challenging the constitution, and get what ever result you want. Like changing the definition of enemy combatant to mean any immigrant. Now retroactively you can pick or choose who is a REAL citizen.
Free societies hate this one trick
No, the final check on authoritarianism is the people.
And the people are divided by identitarianism. The oligarchs roam free.
If the title of an article contains a question, the answer is no.
Also known more formally as Betteridge’s law of headlines.
They won’t enforce shit.
They haven’t so far. Why would they start?
They ruled that one time that states can’t unilaterally overrule the will of the people. That was nice. But that’s how low the bar is, people weren’t sure if they would completely override democracy (yet).
Removed by mod
Don’t feed the troll.
