• stevedidWHAT@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    They’re literally rewriting core libraries as we speak in Rust but go off I guess you obviously know it all

    • animelivesmatter@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s not most libraries. They’re rewriting very specific libraries in Rust, generally ones that require both memory safety and concurency

    • kopper [they/them]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      in fairness to them microsoft takes their backwards compatibility seriously to the point where i’d absolutely see them keeping their old implementation hidden somewhere and hot-swapping it in when they detect an old program that needs some inexplicable internal access to some C struct being launched.

      • stevedidWHAT@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        This is true, that could be the case based off previous observations buuuut considering they’re doing this for security purposes, I think it make little sense to leave them behind

    • Milady@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Didn’t know they did. And what I said was a jab at windowd but go off I guess you obviously want to feel hurt.