• DagwoodIII@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    edit-2
    24 hours ago

    Does anyone know which book this is based on?

    edit = silly me. Dune Messiah. as per the interwebs

      • gigastasio@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        28
        ·
        23 hours ago

        I seem to recall Denis making it clear this is where he intends to stop, for exactly this reason.

        Having grown up on the Lynch film, I’m frankly astounded and delighted that we got a Dune adaptation that made it this far.

        • Skullgrid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          edit-2
          23 hours ago

          I seem to recall Denis making it clear this is where he intends to stop, for exactly this reason.

          goddamnit, I wanted to see

          spoiler

          Leto 2 becoming the sandworm god

          but I guess with some of the disappointing scenes in the 2nd film (Paul taming Shai Hulud, the visions just being shots on a beach) , it probably wasn’t going to go down the way I wanted to. It’s a shame.

          Soundtrack was still awesome, but it did re-use a LOT from the previous film

          • MalikMuaddibSoong@startrek.website
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            20 hours ago

            At least the syfy miniseries dared to adapt Children of Dune.

            I actually like it. We finally get an Irulan with agency and see Alia as a full character. And Leto 2 getting sandy.

            Not sure how I feel about the Baron narrating in rhyming couplets though. Maybe just a tad too strange, even for Dune.

          • gigastasio@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            20 hours ago

            I did not, but not for lack of interest. I just never got around to it. I know very little about it but it always looked to me like the visuals at least drew very heavily from Lynch’s movie.

          • chuckleslord@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            20 hours ago

            But why not? Who doesn’t love a giant worn talking around the fact that he’s created a fascist dictatorship for some vague promise that’ll it all pay off one day? /s

              • chuckleslord@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                12 hours ago

                Oh! Did you not know and were speculating? The movies will only cover the first two books. The third book is when stuff starts to get… odd.

                But the fourth book is mostly talking with an action set piece at the beginning and the end. I didn’t read the next book

                • QuoVadisHomines@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  10 hours ago

                  No Im in my 50s and Im spacing whether it’s the fourth or fifth book that is mostly Leto engaging in exposition.

                  If ypu missed the last book you missed “Jews in Space” before Mel Brooks thought of it.

  • scytale@piefed.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    22 hours ago

    The two things I’m looking forward to (if they bother showing them) are how they depict the Guild Navigators and Tleilaxu. The latter was kinda teased in the Dune: Prophecy series but that was a lower budget production, so I wonder if they will do it differently.

    • undeffeined@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Also want to see the navigators and the tleilaxu. Dune prophecy was a big let down for me. Also very curious to see the Stone Burner on the big screen.

    • djsoren19@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      20 hours ago

      I think the only parts I’d really categorize as a disaster kinda need a third movie to explain. I really don’t like how Denis changed Paul and Chani’s relationship, but maybe it’ll get paid off in a satisfying way in part three.

      Or it’ll just continue being extremely out of character teen angst for contrived plot reasons, idk

    • iSeth@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      22 hours ago

      “Because it’s profitable”, is my guess. I thought it was a good adaptation, what did you find so disastrous?

    • JillyB@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Part 2 was not a disaster. Personally, I think both parts were really good. No idea where you’re getting such a negative opinion of part 2.