• IsThisAnAI@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    11 hours ago

    Spending what I assume is hundreds of dollars chasing analog noise to be encoded digitally over BT. Just fantastic.

  • grue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    17 hours ago

    It’s stupid that this thing apparently can’t record from a computer or line-in onto cassette.

    It’s also unclear whether it can digitize music from cassette onto a computer with high quality, and if it can’t do that that would also be stupid.

    • comrade_twisty@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      17 hours ago

      The article states that the usb-c port is just for charging, so that should answer all your questions with a solid “No, it cannot do any of that”.

    • MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Digitising skills be a given but as long as it has a high quality audio jack you can do it through that.

      Recording onto cassette is different though because doesn’t that need a specific writer head?

      • zaphod@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        15 hours ago

        It doesn’t necessarily require a different tape head for recording, but ideally a different head is used. For recording it should have an erase head though, otherwise you’re recording over what is already on the tape. Digitising tape in high quality requires a good playback mechanism that has low wow and flutter, I doubt this thing has that, most recent portable cassette players had the same bad mechanism.

      • Cort@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Recording from line in was the way to make mix tapes. Seems like it’s missing the record function completely

        • accideath@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          16 hours ago

          It also most likely has the same cheap head and mechanics as any other new tape player you can get nowadays. If you want good quality, get something that was good in the 90s.

          • zloubida@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            13 hours ago

            That’s often true with new models of old technology. It’s the same with mechanical typewriters: there are still new ones constructed and they are far from ugly; but if you want to actually use one, run far away and buy a vintage one.

  • viking@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Their target market must be in the double digits! And I’m not talking relative.

    • kurikai@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Actual. It’s really good for children. Something you don’t have to worry about with them, and no internet required. And they have a physical thing the can put in and play and record music with

      • IsThisAnAI@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        11 hours ago

        No indication of can record.

        Children’s MP3 players are easier and cost $30.

        This is a hard nostalgia fix for nerds with disposable income.