You can tell it’s not real though, because of the bad padding and too-large font size, etc. So that takes away from the experience more than a picture’s image quality, in my opinion.
Authenticity trumps image quality. 🤷♂️ My two cents.
You can tell it’s not real though, because of the bad padding and too-large font size, etc. So that takes away from the experience more than a picture’s image quality, in my opinion.
Authenticity trumps image quality. 🤷♂️ My two cents.
How many currently in the relationship?
Would be nice to have one or two more people in our relationship
You mean like, kids?
I also want that for you, buddy. Stay strong.
Crazy, I just watched a video about that copper trader the other day.
Although they said that the statue often associated with him — the one in the image here — doesn’t actually depict him at all.


Huh, I would think the “-sexual” was referring to your sex. Odd. I guess it became guilty by association with those other, similar-sounding words.


Oh my gosh you gotta hook me up, my dude 🙏


What I’m reading when looking it up is that “trans” is an umbrella term for both.
Are there any good references for this?
Also seems to be that you could be transsexual without being transgender. What if you identify as internal male but feel like your body should be female? Is that not possible? Maybe I’m overthinking it.


Is this incorrect, then? (See: “Etymology 2”)


Oh that’s bullshit.
It must be really bad over there at that billion-dollar company where they can’t maintain both a website and a native app. Aww.


Both of my workplaces use Outlook, and it’s so cumbersome. Microsoft’s products do not work well on Linux/Firefox. It’s like they only test in Edge.
Tried to install and use Thunderbird the other day. Of course I need to ask an administrator to get permission to use Thunderbird as an approved app for both organizations. Not gonna happen, probably. 💀


I thought “trans” was short for transsexual? Could someone bring me up to speed here?
In what way is it outdated?
Let’s just say it’s a mechanical device. Otherwise it’s too much of a spoiler. 😅
Watch it, it’s one of my favorites. Jodie Foster kills in it. So good.
I’m not in the US but this shit hits globally, especially the Ukraine war which is closer to me here in Europe.
I’m at least lucky to be driving an EV and not being affected so much by the gas prices, which are now back to peak pandemic/Ukraine war prices.
Had a friend telling me they filled half a tank for like $90. Pretty crazy. Meanwhile charging from 20–90% is like $15 for me.


That’s so crazy how we can be so opposite 😄
The scary part about knives for me is how actually dangerous they are. Like people getting stabbed can die just as easily as from a gunshot wound. Knives wreck one’s insides. And when people stab people they usually don’t just do the one stab. It’s often really going all in. 😭 And like, the feeling of having been stabbed and losing your life semi-slowly. So scary to me.
Okay fair enough, this is more exhausting than it’s worth so I have no interest in taking this further. 👍 Have a good one!
Sugar is clearly not a necessary part of nutrition. I have several relatives who live completely sugar-free who are feeling better than they ever have. No sugar intake, not even fruit, no carbs that turn into sugar. It’s the LCHF diet. So it’s a pretty good example after all.
Look, you’re doing your very best at making me out to be the bad guy here. With your extreme stretching of what I’m saying, that “we as one people on earth” is “still a grouping” but it’s a group consisting of all people? Come on, bruh. Really? That’s just being extreme. I feel like you’re up to some kind of rhetorical abuse here. It’s not sea-lioning, but almost tangential. Breaking down every single detail of what I’m saying, isolating it from its context, then generalizing it. Ignoring the major points. It’s not a pleasant way to have a discussion, friend. You know what I’m saying and what you’re doing isn’t cool. Just thought I would let you know. (Also, inb4 “oh oh, it’s not pleasant when you’re WRONG?!” I can see this one coming, so please. I’m saying this knowing full well how it sounds.)
Look, I’m just calling it out like I see it, that name-calling isn’t productive, and I told you I’m focusing on this particular example of calling this person a Luddite and how it isn’t helpful to the conversation at all. There’s no need for grouping one individual in this case. Right? That was my point.
Happy cake day!