The Epstein files are the distraction. Not the other way around.

Like, seriously.

Her face doesn’t convey a light-hearted situation. That’s your context.

And frankly, clarifying an openly disrespectful act as ok, because it’s “light-hearted”, is ridiculous.

Whether she’s being honest about not having feelings for you is irrelevant. Honestly, you need to learn to hold more respect for yourself and what’s good for you. Hint: she absolutely is not good for you.

Also, flirtation is not a sign of anything deeper or meaningful.

I don’t see the humor. Just some dick being disrespectful to a person that trusts them.

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Yeah, she’s an authoritarian cunt.

Still, wasn’t hard to care against Mango Mussolini.

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Oh, for sure. I mean, the lemming I replied to is quite infamous… ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

For real?

It’s just that hard to actively trust fascism or what?!

Somebody has fantasies if getting bent over…

( ͡~ ͜ʖ ͡°)

I wish I could forget about the insurance companies. Monetizing fear itself. Can we get off this timeline please?!

No, I’m just stupid. Obviously.

Just kidding, of course; I will fix.

There’s also the money involved. The pharmaceutical corporations pretty much have things rigged so they make huge profit off of any drug to market. Even those that aren’t really that effective. But when it comes to vaccines, that’s a pretty much a guaranteed demand.

That’s a lot of dough to grease some wheels, if they needed to; no way any kind of ban like this would actually go through. Not that that should surprise anyone, after all, considering how frequently these morons turn out to be all talk, no substance.

Do LLMs in fact evolve?

And is it ever in “spontaneous” fashion? In other words, in order to evolve, do they require human intervention?

Archive link

Nah, don’t give em an inch. Theft of property is, by it’s very nature, a criminal act. Absolutely does not qualify as civil disobedience in any way. Worse it perverts the meaning of that term.

First, I pay attention to if an article references an original source. If not, see if they’re the only one reporting the events in question.

I also tend to look at community reactions a lot, see what other random people have to say. That’s a horrible way to verify truth, but on the other end, it’s the effect of the actions or events that will really matter.

And, yeah, I doubt Fox “News” has referenced an original source in decades, so I’m very skeptical of anything they report. And if they’re the only ones talking about something, I generally assume it’s completely false.