It just happens that in this case the incentives would align cause they’re not paying for the toothpaste.
It just happens that in this case the incentives would align cause they’re not paying for the toothpaste.
Bro has one type of post on his entire account and it’s just him being salty.
Scary compression
I worry that this little fellow is telling lies to discredit my irrational fears.
He probably hates me too.
This is why disabling downvotes on a site fueled by user content is a bad idea.
Because we live in reality and there’s no such thing as a perfect state
Yeah but I have a hot dog and you don’t
I could be wrong but I remember voting and they actually had it split into two questions. The first was whether you wanted to keep the current system, and the second was if no what system would you prefer. Unfortunately people just decided to stick to what they were familiar with even if it’s a flawed system.
EDIT: Double checked and yeah, it was two questions the first of which was whether the system should change or not. 61% of voters opted to keep the existing system. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2018_British_Columbia_electoral_reform_referendum
It’s frustrating for sure, I was even more annoyed when we had a referendum in BC and people opted to keep things the same.
Or just let the developer decide what they think fits their game best? Not every product is for every person, and that’s fine really. Trying to broaden appeal is good, but you don’t want to spread resources so thin that you end up with a mess.
What exactly makes you think that communism is going to remove people having power over other people? That seems to just be intrinsic to humans in general, your economic system isn’t going to change that.
And you can absolutely have social support systems in place if the populous pushes for them. Homeless shelters and welfare aren’t impossible ideas, they’re actively implemented across the world. The same goes for basic needs like healthcare.
Just because your government or community hasn’t implemented it doesn’t mean it’s not possible to do so. It means you need to convince those around you that it’s a good idea.
Okay - you’re just arguing something completely different at this point.
My point was just that this post proposes a solution that doesn’t actually solve anything and just makes new problems.
If you’re incapable of working then you take advantage of the social safety nets that your government or community provides.
I never said I was against having supports in place for those who are unable to work?
Depending on the desirability of the work compared to the compensation yes it seems to be working pretty well
In my home town a sanitation worker makes double the provincial minimum wage and gets benefits. That’s an incentive for a job that has a low barrier to entry but undesirable labour.
The benefit of this system is that you can in fact choose this role instead of being assigned it based on the requirements of society. If the compensation isn’t tempting enough then the employer will increase the compensation until it makes sense. That’s how it’s supposed to work at the very least.
If the current implementation isn’t working then you address the issues with the implementation, you don’t tear it all down and try something completely different.
I don’t need any sins, my knees buckle under the weight of my own body just fine.
Depends what we’re substituting those templated values for.
C#