• 2 Posts
  • 19 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 14th, 2023

help-circle

  • It’s an initiative to stop game companies (EA, Ubisoft, Blizzard etc) from being able to decide if you can play a video game that you’ve bought. The example used is for the video game “The Crew” which was an online-only racing game. After the servers were shutdown by Ubisoft, the game that many people bought became unplayable.

    What StopKillingGames wants, is that any company that publishes / develop games provide a way for people who own the game to continue playing it indefinitely. This would most likely come in the form of a game server that could be run by any owner of the game, and shouldn’t be a requirement that publishers / developers run the servers forever as that would be unsustainable.










  • Devorlon@lemmy.zipto196@lemmy.blahaj.zonerule
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    That sort of rhetoric always feels sexist to me. The implication is that trans women shouldn’t compete since those with XY chromosomes have some sort of superpower that means they’ll beat those with XX.

    The quote “Trans women can compete in sports as long as they don’t win.” always stood out to me.


  • Reading the article, they collect the data necessary to federate with an instance. If you or I were to run our own instance we would have access to the same data.

    If they were to do anything with that data that they don’t have permission to do, like selling it. They would be in breach of the GDPR and fined 4% of their global annual income, and as we’ve seen with Apple, it’s not profitable to have two wildly separate versions of your product.








  • large corporations have so much control and market share. It is these corporations that encourage regulations like this.

    Exactly, like this. As I said, you can write regulations so that small business aren’t affected by these problems, have it so that if you operate under a certain threshold it doesn’t apply to your company, and when the company does give them ample time and warning of the changes that they need to make.

    You seem to have this notion that laws can only be written in over-complicated lawyer speak, and to a certain extent in places like the US and EU it’s true, but it doesn’t have to. Let’s also reiterate that I’d rather a small business go bust, than continue to produce environmentally unfriendly products in the name of “competition”, due to the whole tens to hundreds of millions of people dying due to the effects of climate change.


  • Ye, let’s ignore climate change and kill millions of people so that small businesses can stay open.

    Which is already not a definite fact, but even if it was the same regulations can be written in such a way that grants exceptions to small businesses and funding to alleviate retooling / development costs.

    If your so worried about small businesses closing down because of regulations, a better way of dealing with it isn’t to stop all regulation.


  • Devorlon@lemmy.ziptoMemes@lemmy.mlStay in school
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    There’s food that goes to waste all over the world. The main issue isn’t the lack of it, but how to get it where it needs to. People might be looking for animals to adopt while PETA euthanises the ones they receive not because they want to, but because the operational costs of shipping / holding until someone will pick up said animal would be unmanageable.