A 13-year-old student was expelled from a Louisiana middle school after hitting a male classmate who she said created and shared a deepfake pornographic image of her, according to her family’s lawyers.

  • lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    20 hours ago

    but that’s a lot to ask of a 13 year old

    Not of her parents, though.

    While her actions are understandable, violent force without imminent danger is still difficult to justify. In practical terms, though, that kid needed a severe beatdown & the shitty administrators need to face consequences.

    • thejoker954@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      12 hours ago

      stop trying to argue both sides.

      “She should of done xyz instead” in one sentence “that boy deserved it” the next.

      • lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        11 hours ago

        Principles like nonviolence & justifiability aren’t really negotiable. Maybe you should try morality sometime.

        • thejoker954@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          I love how you keep trying to gloss over the fact that you are arguing both sides - How the fuck is that “moral”?

          Oh becaue you are doing it and you can do no wrong from up on your high horse.

          Either you are a troll or you have legitimate brain damage - either way -blocked.

        • Koarnine@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          10 hours ago

          The moral thing here is for that sexual assaulting scum to be expelled and criminally charged, and the girl defended.

          That didn’t happen, the girl was punished the boy protected.

          She did the right thing, pussyhole lad should’ve been beat far worse for his crime, if he wasn’t going to be properly punished.

          There’s no morality in non-violence that allows violence to go unchecked. It was her last resort and it still isn’t good enough for you.

          If she didn’t do that it would have continued and probably even gotten worse.

          • lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            7 hours ago

            The moral thing here is for that sexual assaulting scum to be expelled and criminally charged, and the girl defended.

            Right.

            She did the right thing

            Nope: see violence.

            There’s no morality in non-violence that allows violence to go unchecked.

            There was no violence until she performed it. Maybe you need a dictionary.

            It was her last resort and it still isn’t good enough for you.

            Far from it: there were higher authorities, the press, lawsuits, shaming & embarrassing the school administration publicly until they cave. They weren’t exhausted.

            Violence is only justified in imminent danger. In civilized society, we only authorize lawful force. I think you know that. Lacking integrity by corrupting & bending moral principles when challenged isn’t moral: learn morality.