return2ozma@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 16 hours agoSanders calls deal to end government shutdown a "disaster"www.cbsnews.comexternal-linkmessage-square91fedilinkarrow-up1661arrow-down12
arrow-up1659arrow-down1external-linkSanders calls deal to end government shutdown a "disaster"www.cbsnews.comreturn2ozma@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 16 hours agomessage-square91fedilink
minus-squareJasonDJ@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkarrow-up20arrow-down1·13 hours agoPor que no los dos? MA lost the ballot initiative for ranked choice voting by lobbyists who made enough people believe it’s too complicated. Too complicated? Motherfucker you’ve been ranking favorite things longer than you’ve been shitting on a toilet.
minus-squareHubertManne@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·12 hours agoooh now im thinking lets just do tier list of canidates.
minus-squareskulblaka@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up4·12 hours agoThat’s almost literally exactly what RCV is.
minus-squareHubertManne@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·10 hours agoalmost. the problem with tier lists is maga folks would put trump as S tier and someone like me would not rank anyone above B and more likely C.
minus-squareveni_vedi_veni@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·edit-225 minutes agoW/e it lays the groundwork for having a system which aligns more with what you are voting for rather than against. Also, oompa-loompa isn’t likely to live much longer in actuarial terms, especially that diet considered.
Por que no los dos?
MA lost the ballot initiative for ranked choice voting by lobbyists who made enough people believe it’s too complicated.
Too complicated? Motherfucker you’ve been ranking favorite things longer than you’ve been shitting on a toilet.
ooh now im thinking lets just do tier list of canidates.
That’s almost literally exactly what RCV is.
almost. the problem with tier lists is maga folks would put trump as S tier and someone like me would not rank anyone above B and more likely C.
W/e it lays the groundwork for having a system which aligns more with what you are voting for rather than against.
Also, oompa-loompa isn’t likely to live much longer in actuarial terms, especially that diet considered.