• smh@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      I have a terrier with a history of mouse murder, but he’s not doing jack against the mice in our creepy attic with exposed fiberglass.

    • pulsewidth@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Two reasons: laziness (glue trap goes in the bin without having to clean it, and effectiveness (not much escapes them).

      Both are bad reasons, given the additional environmental costs and inhumane method.

  • Sunshine (she/her)@lemmy.caOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    Glue traps fail as a long-term solution because they neglect to address the source of the problem: As long as food remains accessible, more animals will move in to take the place of those who have been killed.

    • rbesfe@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Sure, but there are only so many mice in an area and only so many of those that find their way into an undesirable location. You can make better arguments against glue traps than “killing vermin doesn’t make them go away forever”

    • Binzy_Boi@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      The reason why glue traps in particular are horrible is because unlike snap traps, they aren’t an instant-kill, leaving the mice to unnecessarily suffer through starvation, often over multiple days.

      There are documented cases of mice and rats self-cannibalising to escape glue traps, as well as cases where they break their own bones in the struggle to escape. It’s needless pain, even mouse trap enthusiasts are more often than not against glue traps because they see it as being needlessly cruel.

      It’s easy to shit on PETA, but they have things right in this case.