Alas Poor Erinaceus@lemmy.ml to Privacy@lemmy.mlEnglish · 6 天前Zenni’s Anti-Facial Recognition Glasses are Eyewear for Our Paranoid Agewww.404media.coexternal-linkmessage-square90fedilinkarrow-up1318arrow-down17
arrow-up1311arrow-down1external-linkZenni’s Anti-Facial Recognition Glasses are Eyewear for Our Paranoid Agewww.404media.coAlas Poor Erinaceus@lemmy.ml to Privacy@lemmy.mlEnglish · 6 天前message-square90fedilink
minus-squarederanger@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up8·6 天前The idea is it reflects IR and blows out the exposure.
minus-squareAuli@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·6 天前But IR Is only on during low light conditions.
minus-squarederanger@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up5·6 天前I’m just pointing out that it’s not IR blocking, it’s IR reflecting.
minus-squarequick_snail@feddit.nllinkfedilinkarrow-up1·5 天前The sun emits IR in non low light conditions
minus-squarefruitycoder@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up3·6 天前I agree with your sentiment. Security is trust but verify kind of field and some proof from a third party to kind of audit this claim would be great. Also it’s not the guy you linked to jobs lol
minus-squareMalReynolds@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·6 天前 Security is trust but verify kind of field Nope, security is an archetypal verify before trust kind of field.
minus-squarefruitycoder@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up1·5 天前You I guess it more depends on the threat model. That can also be a fully valid stance as well
minus-squarederanger@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up2·6 天前Prove what? I’m merely relaying the info from the article you didn’t read.
minus-squareartyom@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down7·6 天前 Prove what? …what you said? That these lenses reflect IR and blow out the exposure. the article you didn’t read. …the paywalled article? Yeah, didn’t read it.
The idea is it reflects IR and blows out the exposure.
But IR Is only on during low light conditions.
I’m just pointing out that it’s not IR blocking, it’s IR reflecting.
The sun emits IR in non low light conditions
Prove it
I agree with your sentiment. Security is trust but verify kind of field and some proof from a third party to kind of audit this claim would be great.
Also it’s not the guy you linked to jobs lol
Nope, security is an archetypal verify before trust kind of field.
You I guess it more depends on the threat model. That can also be a fully valid stance as well
Prove what? I’m merely relaying the info from the article you didn’t read.
…what you said? That these lenses reflect IR and blow out the exposure.
…the paywalled article? Yeah, didn’t read it.